AUDITORS REPORT ON CORPORATE GOVERNANCEIN NIGERIA NON-FINANCIAL INSTITUTION A CASE STUDY OF GUINNESS NIGERIA PLC

Abstract

The major corporate collapses and related frauds which occurred in Nigeria and around the world have raised doubts about the credibility of the operating and financial reporting practices of companies in Nigeria.

This stirred a number of professional and regulatory organizations to recommend reforms that will improve transparency in financial reporting and thereby increase audit quality and corporate governance practices.

Although evidence of corporate governance practices and audit report exists from developed economies, very scanty studies have been conducted in Nigeria where corporate governance is just evolving. Therefore, this study provides evidence on corporate governance, audit report, and firm related attributes from a developing country,Nigeria. Logistic regression was used in investigating the questions that were raised in the study. Findings from the study show that ownership by non-executive director has the possibility of increasing the quality of audit report.

Evidence also exist that size of the company and business leverage are important factors in audit report for companies  on the Nigerian Stock Exchange. The study suggests that the composition of non-executive directors as members of the board should be sustained and improved upon in order to enhance audit quality.

CHAPTER ONE:

• INTRODUCTION

According to McConomy and Bujaki, 2000), there has been a considerable debate in recent times concerning the need for strong corporate governance globally(,with countries around the world drawing up guidelines and codes of practice to strengthen governance (Cadbury, 1997, Corporate Governance Code of Nigeria, 2005). The rationale for this emphasis can be linked to increased concerns over the integrity of securities markets (International Federation ofAccountants-IFAC, 2010; Millstein, 1999).

Good corporate governance by boards of directors is recognized to influence the quality of financial reporting, which in turn has an important impact on investor confidence (Levitt, 1998 and 2000). Studies have shown that good governance reduces the adverse effects of earnings management as well as the likelihood of creative financial reporting arising from fraud or errors (Beasley, 1996; Dechow, et al., 1996; McMullen, 1996).

Traditionally, the external auditor has also played an important role in improving the credibility of financial information (Mautz and Sharaf, 1961; Wallace, 1980).

In recent times, a series of well-publicized cases of accounting improprieties in Nigeria has captured the attention of investors and regulators alike. The search for meansto ensure reliable and high financial reporting has largely focused on the structure of audit report. The auditing profession has been proactive in attempting to improve audit report by issuing standards focused on discovery and independence. As a result, there has been a concerted effort to devise ways of enhancing independence (Corporate Governance Code of Nigeria, 2005; Blue Ribbon Committee, 1999). The profession has also responded to denigrations on audit report. It emphasized that, by its nature, the inherent limitations of an audit make it impossible to eliminate the risk of audit failure (Ricchiute, 1998; IFAC, 2009). The effect of sound governance practices on the quality of financial reporting has recently received attention from researchers, particularly in the United States (McMullen, 1996; Beasley, 1996; Beasley, et al., 2000; Abbott, et al., 2000). The main focus of these studies is the relation between auditcommittees and fraudulent financial reporting, with results generally supporting a negative relation between anactive audit committee and the likelihood of a company being cited for fraudulent reporting. While these resultsprovide evidence from a strong and sophisticated capital market environment, very little research has beenconducted in countries where capital markets are less developed and where governance mechanisms are stillevolving. However, sound corporate governance practices are equally, if not more important, in countries thatare attempting to gain credibility among global investors.

This is particularly so in Nigeria as the countryattempts to regain investor confidence following widely reported financial crises.

1.2 STATEMENT OF THE PROBLEM                                    

The weakness of corporate governance has proved to be the most important factor blamed for the corporate failure consequences from the economics and corporate crises. There is much that can be done to improve the integrity of financial reporting through greater accountability, the restoration of resources devoted to audit function, and better corporate governance policies (Saudagaran, 2003). Concerns have also emerged about reduced audit report. Economist (2004) noted that there are questions about the independence of the “Big 4” and suggested that concentration is lowering the quality of audits. Therefore, our study extends and contributes to the body of research using Nigerian data to investigate the likely impact of audit report and governance related attributes.

This study is motivated by the interest surrounding the appropriateness of reforms instituted by corporate governance code in Nigeria in response to the corporate failures, global best practice and their implied efficacy in the face of significant implementation and audit report. We investigate empirically the relationship of attributes in the code in improving financial reporting quality.

1.3 OBJECTIVES OF THE STUDY

This study specifically identified the following objectives:

1. To examine if board independence affects audit report.
2. To investigate ifnon-executive directors’ ownership affects audit

report.

iii.     To examine if executive directors’ ownership and audit report

1. To identify the structure of the CEO/Chairmanship of companiesin Nigeria; and
2. To examine the relationship between board compositions, ownership, institutional structures, CEOChairmanship and firm characteristics on audit report.

1.4 RESEARCH QUESTIONS

The main research problem is broken down into sub-problems stated as research questions, which guided thestudy. Attempts were made in the course of the research to resolve the following questions which are raised:

1. Does board independencehave any relationship with audit report?
2. Does non-executive directors’ ownership affects audit report?

iii.     Is there a relationshipbetween executive directors’ ownership and audit report?

1.5 RESEARCH HYPOTHESES

The null hypotheses stated below, were tested in order to provide answers to the research questions mentioned.

Hypothesis 1:

H (₀):There is no significant relationship between boards

independence and audit report.

H (₁):There is significant relationship between board’sindependence and audit report.

Hypothesis 2:

H (₀):There is no significant relationship between non-executive directors’ ownership and audit report.

H (₁):There is significant relationship between non-executive directors’ ownership and audit report.

Hypothesis 3:

H (₀):There is no significant relationship between executive directors’ ownership and audit report.

H (₁):There is significant relationship between executive directors’ ownership and audit report

1.6 SIGNIFICANCE OF THE STUDY

The importance of auditing can be illustrated under the principal-agent relationship. The demand for external audits is directly related to the fact that it is the directors (the agents) who prepare the financial statements, which is primarily based on cost reasons. Therefore, this study is expected to provide useful insight into improving audit report. This study contributes to the audit literature as it provides additional empirical evidence on the impact of the size of audit firm on the level of audit report. The study also reflects the quality of audit report in Nigeria. This study will be useful to stakeholders in the Nigerian Stock Exchange (NSE), as it provides evidence on the relationship between audit report and the reform instituted by them in formulating the Code of Corporate Governance for listed companies in Nigeria.

1.7 SCOPE OF THE STUDY

This study is premised on the appraisal of audit report and corporate governance in Nigeria. Therefore, data on corporate organisations in Nigeria were sought in providing answers to the problems and questions that have been raised in this research work. The study focuses on Guinness Nigeria plc.

1.8 LIMITATION OF STUDY

This study is also limited to one organisation basically because of certain factors.

These factors include;

1. Finance: Lack of finance was a major handicap in this research project. This is a result of the huge transport cost involved in the collection of information necessary for the work.
2. Time: Time equally posed a very big constraint in this research work in the sense that the time for the study was limited and could not accord the researcher the opportunity to cover some other organisation that could be involved in the research.
3. Accessibility: During the course of this research project, the researcher found it very difficult to have access to the population of interest and as a result, not all the desired information was collected since enough visit was not made.
4. Reluctant attitude of Respondents: The research work was equally saddled with the problem of the reluctant attitude of respondents who found it difficult to avail the researcher with information necessary for the work for fear of exposition.

1.9 RESEARCH METHODOLOGY

The hypotheses formulated for this studywill be carried out using primary data and secondary data. The primary data consists of self-administered questionnaires and personal interviews, while the secondary data consists of data from various journals, magazines, annual reports of banks, the internet and other literatures. Data collected will be gathered, presented and analyzed accordingly using chi-square. Data will be presented using tables and percentages.

References

Abbott, L. J., Park, Y., & Parker, S. (2000). The effects of audit

committee activity and independence  on corporate fraud.
Managerial Finance, 26, 55–67

Accountants – IFAC. (2010). IFAC Comment Letter:  Transparency of

Firms that Audit Public Companies: Consultation Report, [Online]

Available:http://web.ifac.org/publications/ifac-policy-position-

papers-reports-and-comment-letters/commentletters#ifac-

comment-letter-transp on 29/01/2010

Beasley, M. S. (1996). An empirical analysis of the relation between the

board of director composition  and financial statement fraud.

Accounting Review, 71(10), 443-465

Blue Ribbon Committee. (1999). Report and recommendations of the

Blue Ribbon Committee on  improving the effectiveness of corporate audit committee, New York: NYSE and NASD.    

Corporate Governance Code of Nigeria. (2005). Lagos: SEC

Dechow, P.M., Sloan, R.G., & Sweeney, A.P. (1996). Causes and

consequences of earnings  manipulation: An analysis of firms

subject to enforcement actions by the SEC. Contemporary

Accounting Research, 13(1), 1-36

International Federation of Accountants- IFAC. (2009). Rebuilding

Public Confidence In Financial Reporting: An International Perspective, [Online] Available:

http://web.ifac.org/publications/ifac-policy-position-papers-reports-and-comment-letters/reports-1#developments-in-the-financial-

reporting-supply-chain-results-from-a-global-study-among-ifac-

member-bodies on 7/01/2010

Levitt, A. (1998). The numbers game. Remarks delivered at the NYU

Center for Law and Business.  New York, NY, September 28. [Online] Available: http://www.sec.gov/news/speech/speecharchive/1998/spch220.txt

on 12/10/2009

Levitt, A. (2000). Speech by SEC Chairman: Remarks Before the

Conference on the Rise and Effectiveness of New Corporate

Governance Standards, Federal Reserve Bank, New York,

[Online] Available: http://www.sec.gov/news/speech/spch449.htm

on 19/10/2000.

McMullen D.A. (1996). Audit committee performance: an investigation

of the consequences  associated with audit committees. Auditing:

A Journal of Practice & Theory, 15(1), 87–103

Millstein, I. M. (1999). Introduction to the Report and

Recommendations of the Blue Ribbon  Committee on Improving

the Effectiveness of Corporate Audit Committees. Business

Lawyer, 54(3), 1097-1111

Ricchiute, D.N. (1998). Evidence, memory, and causal order in a

complex audit decision task.  Journal of Experimental Psychology:

Applied, 4(1), 3-15

Wallace, W.A., (1980). The Economic role of the audit in free and

regulated markets, Touche Ross &  Co. Aid to Education Program

DOWNLOAD COMPLETE WORK

DISCLAIMER: All project works, files and documents posted on this website, eProjectTopics.com are the property/copyright of their respective owners. They are for research reference/guidance purposes only and some of the works may be crowd-sourced. Please don’t submit someone’s work as your own to avoid plagiarism and its consequences. Use it as a reference/citation/guidance purpose only and not copy the work word for word (verbatim). The paper should be used as a guide or framework for your own paper. The contents of this paper should be able to help you in generating new ideas and thoughts for your own study. eProjectTopics.com is a repository of research works where works are uploaded for research guidance. Our aim of providing this work is to help you eradicate the stress of going from one school library to another in search of research materials. This is a legal service because all tertiary institutions permit their students to read previous works, projects, books, articles, journals or papers while developing their own works. This is where the need for literature review comes in. “What a good artist understands is that nothing comes from nowhere. The paid subscription on eProjectTopics.com is a means by which the website is maintained to support Open Education. If you see your work posted here by any means, and you want it to be removed/credited, please contact us with the web address link to the work. We will reply to and honour every request. Please notice it may take up to 24 – 48 hours to process your request.