ABSTRACT
This study was carried out to evaluate the compliance with standard postero-anterior (PA) chest Techniques in University ofNigeria Teaching Hospital Ituku Ozalla. A total of 375 assessment sheets were used in this study. The age range of patients whose their chest radiographs participated in this study ranged from (1-10) years to (70-80) years with the female radiographs being much in number tan that of male patients. Form hundred assessment sheet were used but only three hundred and seventy five assessment sheets were properly filled and used for analysis. From the result s obtained the age group of (31-40) years was the highest in female category with 44 chest radiographs while (21-30) years age group appeared to be highest in male category with 39 chest radiographs. The study showed that the major causeof film repeats and rejections were one to much of artifacts. From my finding, I observed thatlots of radiographs about 115 (30.7)% chest radiographs had rotations. This was detected from misalignments of medical ends of clavicles from spinous process. The study detailed that 60 (16)% chest radiographs were without identification markers especially anatomical markers while 298 (79.5)% chest radiographs had the ,marker properly and clearly placed at the right borders. Also, the write up revealed that 340 (90.7) % chest radiographs were without objective lung field while 320 (85.3) % chest radiographs had good inspirational demonstrations. Moreover, a good scapulars thrown off were witnessed in the study with 300 (80) % chest radiographs while 360 (96) % chest radiographs with symmetric density of the lungs denotes a fairly alignmentof grid in relation tothe image receptors. Also, the contrast of lung periphery was not adequate throughout the study, causing 180 (48)% chest radiographs to the in fair range a sin fig 1. Also thehistogram in fig 1. Shown that the cardiac shadow had the greatest contrast in 260 (69.3)% chest radiographs. The fig 11 left us with the knowledge that 181(172.8) chest radiographs had a greatest sharpness of radiographs qualities.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Title page – – – – – – – – – i
Certification – – – – – – – – ii
Approval – – – – – – – – – iii
Dedication – – – – – – – – – iv
Acknowledgement – – – – – – – v
Abstract – – – – – – – – – vi
Table of contents – – – – – – – – vii
CHAPTER ONE
Introduction
Background of study
CHAPTER TWO
Literature review
Review of related literature …………………………………………………….14
Theoretical Background …………………………………………………………19
2.2 Anatomy of the respiratory system ……………………………….19
2.2.1 The pharynx ………………………………………………………19
2.2.2 The larynx ………………………………………………………..20
2.2.3 The trachea ……………………………………………………….21
2.2.4 The Bronchi ……………………………………………………….22
2.2.5 The Lungs …………………………………………………………23
2.2.6 The pleura ………………………………………………………..24
2.3 The Anatomy of the Heart ………………………………………..26
2.4 Radiographicprocedure ……………………………………………29
2.4.1 Projection …………………………………………………….…..29
2.4.2 Posterior – anterior care of the patient …………………….……29
2.4.3 Positioning ………………………………………………….…….29
2.4.4 Centering Point …………………………………………….……..30
2.5 Radiographic description of chest ………………………………..,.30
CHAPTER THREE
Research Methodology
3.1 Research designs ……………………………………………………33
3.2 Area of study ………………………………………………………..33
3.3 Population Sampling Method and sampling size ………………….33
3.4 Method of Data collection ………………………………………….34
3.5 Description of the Assessment Sheet ………………………………34
3.6 Explanation of standard Chest Criteria …………………………….35
CHAPTER FOUR
Data Analysis and Presentation ……………………………………………41
CHAPTER FIVE
5.1 Discussion ……………………………………………………….…….46
5.2 Summary of findings …………………………………………………..48
5.3 Recommendation ………………………………………………………49
5.4 Area of further studies …………………………………………………50
5.5 Limitation of study ……………………………………………………50
5.6 Conclusion …………………………………………………………….51
Reference ………………………………………………………………52
Bibliography ……………………………………………………………55
LIST OF TABLES
Table I: Age and sex distribution of patients.
Table II: A distribution of patients’ identification markers.
Table III: A distribution of patients positioning criteria.
LIST OF FIGURES
Fig I: Distribution of subjective contrast of radiographs with number of radiographs.
Fig II: Distribution of the radiographs according to their degree of sharpness.
INTRODUCTION
Background of the study
The clinical application of r-ray began almost immediately following the discovery of x-rays by Wilhelm Conrad Roentgen in 1895. Since then, diagnostic x-ray equipment has developed considerably and the imaging quality of x- ray examination has been greatly improved and the method has been widely disseminated1. In particular chest radiography is the most common examination to be used as one of the initial steps to diagnose pulmonary disease including respiratory infection with tuberculosis (TB)2 .The role of chest radiography has gained increasing importance in trauma cases, routine check ups, disease conditions and metastatic problems. The rational behind this study is that many faulty diagnoses by chest radiography may be associated with inappropriate radiological techniques and application and that improvement of imaging quality of chest radiography benefits not only the patients infected by disease but also those suffering from various pulmonary disease. In terms of detection and treatment of pulmonary disease, poor imaging quality may be more harmful to patients than having the patients not diagnosed through x- ray study is to provide a simple way to assess the quality of chest radiograph as well as fundamental of chest radiography, and to lead to conducting quality assurance for chest radiography even in resource constrained settings, chest radiograph with poor image quality can cause misdiagnoses or require repeated examinations, wasting economic resources and exposing patients to unnecessary radiation. Consequently, providing high quality imaging of chest radiograph befits anyone who will be examined by x-ray, and the precise control of these x-ray images is an important task for the radiographers; radiological technologists or radiological technicians.
Quality assurance (QA) refers to the planned and systematic activities implemented in a quality system so that quality requirements for a product or service will be fulfilled3. It is the systematic measurement comparison with a standard, monitoring of processes and an associated feedback loop that confers error prevention. Quality assurance in chest radiography is a system designed to continuously improve the quality of chest radiograph at a health facility, and it can be achieved through organized efforts by all staff members involved in taking or reading the chest radiograph. It comprises quality control, quality assessment, and quality improvement4. Quality control includes all quality control efforts routinely performed by staff at each health facility such as regular maintenance or checking of x-ray equipments, accessory devices and chemicals and consumables.
Quality assessment is the measurement against a gold standard. Quality improvement is the process of using the information gained through assessment to improve quality, with the key component of data collection data analysis, and creative problem solving. It includes continuous monitoring and evaluation, identifying defects and retaining of staff for prevention of recurrent problems. In other words, we can only achieve quality assurance through quality control, quality assessment, and quality improvement. Pointing out the assessment result of a chest radiograph to staff is not the end but the means.
What is important in the assessment procedure is to seek the source of the problem and to take the steps to improve, so that in the end the quality of the chest radiograph will be improved4. In medicine, a chest radiograph, commonly called a chest x-ray (CXR), is a projection radiographs are among the most common films taken, being diagnostic of many conditions.
Like all methods of radiography, chest radiographs employs ionizing radiation in the form of x-rays to generate images of the chest. The typical radiation dose to an adult form a chest radiograph is around 0.06mSv5. Chest radiographs are used to diagnose many conditions involving the chest wall, bones of the thorax, and structures contained within the thoracic cavity including the lungs, heart, and great vessels.
There are various approaches to quality assurance, some being better than others. Concurrent monitoring off classification levels can be accompanied by adding quality assurance (calibration) radiographs to the set for which classifications are being sought without the reader being aware of which are the calibration radiographs. For example, a national Institute of health sponsored workshop suggested including chest films of unexposed workers in epidemiological studies for purpose of quality control6. Optimally, quality assurance radiographs should included a range of abnormality levels and types previously classified by expert readers. There are many benefits to this approach;
First, because the reader is unaware of which are the quality control radiographs, yet knows that they exist within the study, the reader is under pressure to conform to standard classification practices7.
Second, the results for quality assurance radiographs can be used for assess the accuracy of the reader’s classification. Based on this assessment, it may be necessary to disregard or adjust the reader’s classification. Result of quality control classifications can also be used to provide feedback to readers to maintain and improve readers performance8. This approach eliminates the defects in other quality control approaches, such as those that are undertaken independently and externally to the study and during which a reader may consciously modify their behaviour to appear more mainstream. Although the use of unknown calibration radiographs cannot be expected to eliminate all variation between readers, it should result in the elimination of excesses.8
Knowledge of the functions of x-ray equipment is essential to assess the quality of chest x-rays. With respect to regular maintenance of x –ray equipment, at least one radiographer must bee in charge. On the other hand, it is recommended to have a maintenance contract with a local agent for fault detection, calibration and repair work by a qualified x-ray enginner9.
With regard to chest x-ray, the recommended distance between the tube focus and x-ray film (FFD) is in range of 140-200cm. longer distanced is more desirable for radiological chest examination. The main reason for this longer distance is that it improves the image sharpness through geometric means. The x- ray beam must be aligned straight with the x-ray film10.
The penetrating power of the x-ray beam is controlled by the adjustment of x-ray tube voltage12. The higher the voltage setting, the more energetic and penetrative the x-ray that is produced and the different tissues are visualized at different density levels according to the penetrating power of the x-ray beam. The difference of density levels according to the penetrating power of the x-ray beam. The difference of density levels between the light and dark areas of x-ray films is defined as contrast.
In general, the higher the voltage setting, the different organs in the human body are visualized with less contrast in a radiograph9. With regard to the chest radiograph, higher voltage in the range of 100-120kV is recommended; in order words low contrast imaging between lungs and bones is desirable. The advantage of high x-ray tube voltage is that it produces a more energetic x-ray which penetrates bones so that the pulmonary vessels can be visualized under the bone structure.
The dosage of the x-ray beam is controlled by 2 functions: x-ray tube current and exposure time adjustment. The higher the current setting and / or the longer the exposure time setting, the more x-ray photons are produced and this affects the higher density of x-ray film11. The units of x-ray tube current and exposure time are mA (milliampere) and seconds respectively. In a general ways, the dosage of the x-ray beam control is referred to as ‘mAs, which refers to the multiplication of mA and seconds. The suitable mAs depends on the x-ray unit used, but the recommended exposure time is less than 0.05 second in order to minimize motion artifact caused by the beating of the heart.
With respect to the chest radiograph, the recommended effective focal size of the x-ray tube is smaller than 1.2mm. The main advantage of selecting in smaller focal size is that it reduces the blur of the edge pulmonary vessels in the chest radiography through geometric means13. The degree of appearance of the edge between two density areas in the imaging subject is defined as sharpness. Consequently, a smaller focal size can improve a factor of imaging sharpness, smaller effective focal size example 0.6mm, is more desirable for radiological chest examination, however the smaller the focal size, the harder it is to use a higher mAs setting.13
The x-ray grid looks like a flat metallic plate which is the same size as the x-ray film cassette and it contains very narrow lead strips. The function of the grid is to reduce the scattered radiation from regard to the chest radiography with higher voltage techniques (for example, in the range of 80-120KV), the x ray grid is essential. The minimum required specification of fixed grid for chest radiography is 34 lead strip lines per cm and an 8:1 grid ratio.
Most stationary x-ray equipment needs to be connected to the main electricity in the range of 100 -150A (ampere) with small electrical impedance ie. 0.3 (ohm) or less. The special type of x-ray equipment with high frequency inverter generator requires only 10 -20A electric supply14. Most mobile type of x-ray equipment requires a 10-20A electrical supply. In order to produce a good quality x-ray beam, specifications of the current capacity and its impedance are indicated in the instruction manual specific to that unit of x-ray equipment. The higher the impedance of the electrical supply, the bigger drop of x-ray tub voltage.
Viewing chest radiographs under good conditions is important in order to detect the maximum amount of information. The x-ray film viewer requires a minimum of 2 vertically mounted 15W (watts) fluorescent tubes and the light intensity of x –ray film should be sufficient and even across the entire surface of it.15
A mobile x-ray unit is defined as an x-ray unit on wheels, capable of being moved from one location to another. The capacity and stability of x –ray generation by a mobile x – ray unit is limited. Accordingly, mobile x-ray units should be used only for restricted applications. With regard to chest radiography, basically mobile x-ray is not recommended. However, in a place where only a mobile x-ray units is available, the radiographer can utilize it, paying careful attention to x-ray exposure factors and beam alignment.14
The intensifying screen is a device made of fluorescent materials that emits light when exposed to x –ray.
Two types are available. One emits blue light and the other one emits green light. The emitted blue or green light contributes to a blackening effect on the x-ray film, in terms of its blackening function, green light is more effective than blue light so that the rare earth material (example, gadolinium) which emits green light is widely used in recent years. The intensifying screen may be divided into 3 sensitivity categories such as fast, medium, and slow speed. In general, the lower the sensitivity, the more x-ray exposure needed and the better imaging quality produced. With regard to chest radiography, the intensifying screen emits green light and medium speed sensitivity is recommend. The combination of intensifying screen and film must be matched according to the type of x-ray film; otherwise the imaging quality will be worsened. With regard to the chest radiography, general or regular of either the blue or green variety is recommended.16
Poor darkroom management causes fogging (unwanted density in the areas that are not exposed to the x- ray beam) and artifact (unwanted imaging). With regard to the regular type of x-ray film, the color of safelight is red for both blue and green emission light sensitivity. The recommended electrical power is 15W and should be no more than 25W.17 The distance be more than 150cm, each x-ray film has its own expiration date marked on the outside of the film box and the film have to be use before it expiration date. The temperature and humidity in the darkroom should be controlled through air conditioning and /or a verification fan depending on the local circumstances. Temperatures of 10- 24oC and humidity of 30-50% are recommended.17 The leakage of light from outside into the darkroom must be absolutely avoided by renovation of the darkroom and/or by using some type of light proof materials. The light from a mobile phone will be another source of light that damages x-ray film in a darkroom x –ray film must be handled with care so that its not bent or touched with dirty fingers in a careless manner. Careless handling of x-ray films causes unwanted types of artifacts on the x-ray films.
X-ray film processing will be divided into 5 processes: developing, rinsing, fixing, washing, and drying. The implication of these 5 processes for imaging quality is crucial. This x-ray film processing can be manual procedure or with an automatic processor.
The temperature of the developing solution and the developing time are regulated to maintain a consistent density of x-ray film constantly. The higher the temperature and / or the longer the developing time, the darker the density of x –ray film. Exhausted developing solution has less blackening effect and requires a longer developing time which causes excessive tagging at the same time.18
Rinsing is the process of rinsing of the developing solution with water. Fixing is a process that requires at least 5 minutes and fixes the image on x-ray film semi permanently. Exhausted fixing solution and / or shorter fixing time will cause unwanted strains later on. The condition of developing and fixing solutions can be checked by observation of the color of the solutions. Washing is a process that requires at least 30 minutes to wash out the fixing solution from the x-ray films. Insufficient washing time will cause unwanted yellow color stains later on. Drying is the process that dries out water in a dust free area. The drying temperature must not exceed 350C to avoid damage from overheating.
An automatic x-ray film processor follows the 4 basic procedures as those of manual processing (except rinsing), but under automated and controlled conductions. Consequently, the imaging quality of x-ray film is constant and better and the processing duration is shorter than with manual processing.18
On the other hand, the operation of an automatic x –ray film processor requires appropriate and regular maintenance of a stable power supply, an adequate water supply for washing the film and the regular purchase of developing and fixing solutions. The temperature setting of the developing and the drying procedure must be done following the instructions, for protection against an unreliable supply of electricity, the equipment should be plugged into a voltage stabilizer and also wired to the electric generator so that it will have a power supply in the event of frequent black outs.
All the entire above write –up have to be, into practice to maintain optimum output in chest radiography production, processing and reading skills.
Statement of Problem
- Chest x-ray being the most common diagnosis imaging in radiology department, its qualities has not been ascertained.
- Repeat on chest radiography is on high rate.
- compliance with quality optimum output has not been ascertained
General purpose of study
- To evaluate the quality of inspirational technique during chest x-ray.
- To ascertain the possible positioning that will be observed in chest radiography
- To find the common causes of repeats in chest x-ray.
- To determine the sources of possible poor film quality
Significance
- The result of this work will help radiographers to strictly adhere to the departmental gold standard observed in chest radiography
- The study will assure optimum radiographic output with less repeat of chest radiographs
- The study will illicit the management on provision of all equipment necessary to make every chest radiography a dependable one.
DISCLAIMER: All project works, files and documents posted on this website, eProjectTopics.com are the property/copyright of their respective owners. They are for research reference/guidance purposes only and some of the works may be crowd-sourced. Please don’t submit someone’s work as your own to avoid plagiarism and its consequences. Use it as a reference/citation/guidance purpose only and not copy the work word for word (verbatim). The paper should be used as a guide or framework for your own paper. The contents of this paper should be able to help you in generating new ideas and thoughts for your own study. eProjectTopics.com is a repository of research works where works are uploaded for research guidance. Our aim of providing this work is to help you eradicate the stress of going from one school library to another in search of research materials. This is a legal service because all tertiary institutions permit their students to read previous works, projects, books, articles, journals or papers while developing their own works. This is where the need for literature review comes in. “What a good artist understands is that nothing comes from nowhere. The paid subscription on eProjectTopics.com is a means by which the website is maintained to support Open Education. If you see your work posted here by any means, and you want it to be removed/credited, please contact us with the web address link to the work. We will reply to and honour every request. Please notice it may take up to 24 – 48 hours to process your request.
