Page Length: 35

Size: 109 KB

Format: PDF & Word


This study was conducted to assess the relationship between fake drug (FD) use and people’s
attitude towards healthcare delivery system (HCDS). Participants (n = 103) were both healthcare
providers (56) and consumers (47). 36 were males and 67 were females above eighteen years.
They were selected through a random sampling technique. The mean ages were 37.2, 34.2 and
42.8 for all the participants, female participants and male participants respectively. All testing
took place in Onitsha General Hospital, Community Pharmacies, medical Laboratories and
classroom environments in Onitsha urban. Results revealed significant relationships (r = 0.6, p <
0.05). People’s attitude (selection, organization, and interpretation of health related information to
form a meaningful picture of their health care needs) were considerably affected by the use of FD
in HCDS.

Title page i
Certification page ii
Approval page iii
Dedication iv
Acknowledgement v
Abstract vi
Table of content vii
The usefulness of a good health care delivery system to any population is an obvious fact that
cannot be over emphasized. A healthy individual is a valuable asset not only to himself, to his
family, but also to his society.
The World Health Organization (WHO) (1948) defined health as a state of complete physical,
mental, and social well-being and not merely the absence of disease or infirmity.
In 1986, the WHO in the Ottawa Charter for Health Promotion said health is “a resource for
everyday life, not the objective of living. Health is a positive concept emphasizing social and
personal resources, as well as physical capacities.” Overall health is achieved through a
combination of physical, mental, emotional, and social well-being.
To achieve an overall health, we need health care delivery systems (HCDS) that can provide high
quality medical care, that are responsive to the health needs and expectations of the populations
they are intended to serve, and at affordable costs.
On the other hand, the efforts geared toward achieving overall health, that is, health care
delivery is the prevention, treatment, and management of illness and the preservation of mental
and physical well-being through the services offered by the medical, nursing, pharmaceutical,
dental, clinical laboratory sciences and allied health professions (Wikipedia, 2009).
According to WHO, health care delivery embraces all the goods and services designed to promote
health, including “preventive, curative and palliative interventions, whether directed to
individuals or to populations”. The organized provision of such services constitutes a health care
delivery system. When fake drugs are used in health care delivery the main purpose of health
care delivery system, which is an overall health will not be achieved.
The relationship between fake drug use in healthcare delivery system and how people perceive
health care delivery system will better be appreciated by looking at the levels of health care
delivery systems.
All health care systems contain four essential levels of care (Lunde, 1990):
1. Lay self-care
2. Primary professional care.
3. General specialist care, that is, secondary care.
4. Super specialist care, that is, tertiary care.
And there is a fifth level of care – quaternary care.
The WHO defines self – care as “activities individuals, families, and communities undertake with
the intention of enhancing health, preventing disease, limiting illness, and restoring health. These
activities are derived from knowledge and skills from the pool of both professional and lay
experience. They are undertaken by lay people on their own behalf, either separately or in
participative collaboration with professionals.” The skills and knowledge of self – care will be
manifested in an individual’s ability to take appropriate action(s) to achieve overall health. Such
actions include the ability to know when to seek for professional care, gather information on what
type of care to seek for and where to get desired medical service.
Reports of the media (print and electronic), and lay information on incidences and effects of fake
drugs can influence an individual’s decision on how to access health care. Therefore, it becomes
necessary to determine the relationship between fake drug use in HCDS and how such use affects
people’s perception of HCDS.
Primary health care (PHC) as defined in Alma – Ata Declaration (1978), is essential health care
based on practical, scientifically sound and socially acceptable methods and technology made
universally accessible to individuals and families in the community through their full
participation and at a cost that the community and the country can afford to maintain at every
stage of their development in the spirit of self-determination.
Primary health care is promotive, preventive, and rehabilitative. Health services based on PHC
include at least immunization against the major infectious diseases: measles, whooping cough,
diphtheria, polio, tetanus, and tuberculosis and other components of National Health Policy.
When fake vaccines were used and no immunity conferred on the immunized, such individuals
would be highly disposed to developing the specific disease.
The term secondary health care is a service provided by medical specialists who generally do
not have first contact with patients, for example, cardiologists, urologists and dermatologists. A
physician might voluntarily limit his or her practice to secondary care by refusing patients who
have not seen a primary care provider first, or a physician may be required, usually by various
payment agreements, to limit the practice this way (Wikipedia, 2009).
Tertiary health care is a specialized consultative care, usually on referral from primary or
secondary health care personnel, by specialists working in a centre that has personnel and
facilities for special investigation or diagnosis and treatment ( Wikipedia, 2008).
Quaternary health Care –Quaternary health care is the advanced level of medicines which are
highly specialized and not widely used (Intota, 2009). It is the provision of health care to patients
in cardiac care, orthopedic, neurosciences, oncology, renal care, and so forth.
Given the present situation in Nigeria, the environment is intensely stressful and virtually
everyone’s health is dangerously threatened in one way or another. In periods like this, our health
care delivery system should provide relief to Nigerians, so many of whom are daily on edge
(Adelusi-Adeluyi, 1995). Unfortunately, this painful situation has been compounded by the use of
fake drugs in our health care delivery. It is worthwhile to note that decisions as to the genuineness
of drugs one consumes, appropriateness and competence of both the health care facilities and
personnel deserve a great attention.
In Nigeria, because of chaotic drug distribution, possibility of one becoming a victim of
counterfeit drugs is very high. After all, it is more difficult to secure a house with over a thousand
doors than the one with one or two doors. There are so many handlers (intermediaries) in drug
distribution in Nigeria. Each intermediary is a potential entry point for fake drugs.
According to WHO (2006), “a counterfeit drug is one which is deliberately and fraudulently
mislabeled with respect to identity and / or source. Counterfeiting can apply to both branded and
generic products and counterfeit products may include products with the correct ingredients or
with the wrong ingredients, without active ingredients, with insufficient active ingredients or with
fake packing.”
In the Nigerian counterfeit and Fake Drugs and Unwholesome Processed Foods (Miscellaneous
Provisions) Decree 1993 as amended, a fake drug is defined as
“a. Any drug or drug product which is not what it purports to be; or
b. Any drug or drug product which is so colored, coated, powdered or polished that the
damage is concealed or which is made to appear to be better or of greater therapeutic value than it
really is, which is not labeled in the prescribed manner or which label or container or anything
accompanying the drug bears any statement, design or device which makes false claim for the
drug or which is false or misleading; or
c. Any drug or drug product whose container is so made, formed or filled as to be misleading; or
d. Any drug product whose label does not bear adequate directions for use and such adequate
warning against use in those pathological conditions or by children where its use may be
dangerous to health or against unsafe dosage or methods or duration of use; or
e. Any drug product which is not registered by the National Agency for Food and Drug
Administration and Control (NAFDAC) in accordance with the provisions of the Food, Drugs and
related products (Registration, etc).
The consumption of counterfeit drugs is worst error that can occur in HCDS. It is an error
because both the health care provider and consumer do not know they are using the wrong drug.
Fake drugs are eroding both the essence of health care delivery system (HCDS) and confidence
people have in the system. Counterfeiters are into everything the pharmaceutical industry
produces – from life saving drugs, for example, HIV/AIDS, antituberculosis, anticancer,
antidiabetic, antihypertensive to recreational drugs. The existence and functionality of our HCDS
is being threatened, as many pharmaceutical manufacturers who spend large amounts of money
on research, production and supply of genuine drugs are being edged out of business by fake drug
The relationship between fake drugs and people’s perception of health care delivery system can
be looked at from two perspectives:
Health care consumers’ perspective
Health care providers’ perspective
Counterfeit drugs are believed to be poisonous, toxic, threats to life, health risks, without
therapeutic usefulness, with insufficient therapeutic benefits; and can cause treatment failures,
death, disease complications, worsening of disease conditions, development of drug resistance,
delayed recovery and human organ damage. Because of these effects, the confidence of both the
health care professionals and consumers in our health care delivery system is in doubt.
In the past, Nigerian government through her regulatory agencies such as NAFDAC had made
serious efforts toward solving this problem. The regulatory agencies have increased public
awareness on fake drugs, ensured that drugs in use in Nigeria are approved and registered, known
fake drug manufacturers are banned from marketing their products in Nigeria, re-inspection of
production facilities to ensure that such facilities still conform to appropriate standards, and
persons caught with fake drugs were made to pay heavy penalties. Also, the agencies have
interacted with some foreign governments to ensure that such countries’ pharmaceutical
industries export to Nigeria only genuine products.
This study will investigate the relationship between fake drug use in health care delivery system
and people’s perception of health care delivery system.
We might have heard, we might have observed, and we might have read reports on problems of
fake drugs. Unfortunately, what is known to the public as regards to the problem of fake drugs is
a tip of the ice bag. The true situation is far from known or reported. The cause(s) of most deaths
are not identified or confirmed through autopsy.
But how do these problems affect people’s perception of our health care delivery system? This
question is what this study intends to answer.
It is my belief that this study will
1. Increase the level of commitment of people to their health care needs.
2. Motivate people to ensure that the quality of drugs, health care services and qualification
of their health care providers are as prescribed and regulated by government.
3. Encourage people to acquire self – care knowledge and skills that they need to
participate more actively in fostering their own health and in shaping conditions that influence
their own health.


DISCLAIMER: All project works, files and documents posted on this website, are the property/copyright of their respective owners. They are for research reference/guidance purposes only and some of the works may be crowd-sourced. Please don’t submit someone’s work as your own to avoid plagiarism and its consequences. Use it as a reference/citation/guidance purpose only and not copy the work word for word (verbatim). The paper should be used as a guide or framework for your own paper. The contents of this paper should be able to help you in generating new ideas and thoughts for your own study. is a repository of research works where works are uploaded for research guidance. Our aim of providing this work is to help you eradicate the stress of going from one school library to another in search of research materials. This is a legal service because all tertiary institutions permit their students to read previous works, projects, books, articles, journals or papers while developing their own works. This is where the need for literature review comes in. “What a good artist understands is that nothing comes from nowhere. The paid subscription on is a means by which the website is maintained to support Open Education. If you see your work posted here by any means, and you want it to be removed/credited, please contact us with the web address link to the work. We will reply to and honour every request. Please notice it may take up to 24 – 48 hours to process your request.

WeCreativez WhatsApp Support
Administrator (Online)
Hello and welcome. I am online and ready to help you via WhatsApp chat. Let me know if you need my assistance.