Page Length: 44

Size: 661 KB

Format: PDF & Word


A major challenge for achieving successful mosquito control is overcoming
insecticide resistance. Bacillus thuringiensis which is one of the most
effective biolarvacide for control of species of mosquitoes and monitoring of
larval susceptibility is essential to avoid resistance development. Mosquito
larvacidal activity of Bacillus thuringiensis was assessed by isolating them
from ecologically different soil habitats in and around Enugu metropolis. The
isolate organisms were confirmed as Bacillus thuringiensis based on
biochemical characterization and microscopic observation. The larvacidal
activity of Bacillus thuringiensis isolates was tested against the larval of
mosquito by using the standard cup bioassay. The isolates of Bacillus
thuringiensis showed a significant level of variation in their larvacidal
Title page: – – – – – – – – – i
Certification: – – – – – – – – ii
Dedication: – – – – – – – – iii
Acknowledgement: – – – – – – – iv
Abstract: – – – – – – – – – v
Table of contents: – – – – – – – vi
List of tables: – – – – – – – – viii
1.0 Introduction: – – – – – – – 1
1.1 Crystal composition and morphology: – – – – 3
1.2 General characteristics of Bacillus thuringlensis: – – 4
1.3 Classification of Bacillus thuringiensis subspecies: – – 5
1.4 Ecology and prevalence of Bacillus thuringrensis: – – 5
1.5 Other pathogenic factors of Bacillus thuringiensis: – – 7
1.6 Morphological properties of Bacillus thuringiensis:- – 8
2.0 LITERATURE REVIEW- – – – – – – 10
2.1 Mode of action on target organism: – – – – 10
2.2 Mechanism of action of Bacillus thuringensis formulation: 12
2.3 General application of Bacillus thuringiensis: – – 13
3.0 Material and method: – – – – – – 15
3.1 Soil sample collection: – – – – – – 15
3.2 Isolation of Bacillus thuringiensis: – – – – 16
3.3 Isolation of Bacillus thuringiensis from soil: – – – 16
3.4 Sample staining: – – – – – – – 17
3.5 Biochemical identification: – – – – – 18
3.6 Materials and method of Bacillus theringiensis against
mosquito lava: – – – – – – – 19
3.7 Catalase test: – – – – – – – 20
3.8 Oxidase enzyme activity:- – – – – – 20
3.9 Sugar test: – – – – – – – – 20
3.10 Methyl red test – – – – – – – 21
3.11 Indole test – – – – – – – – 22
4.0 Result of sample collection and isolation: – – – 23
4.1 Colony morphology of Bacillus isolates: – – – 24
4.2 Biochemical test: – – – – – – – 25
4.3 Bioassay: – – – – – – – – 27
Discussion: – – – – – – – – – 28
Conclusion: – – – – – – – – – 28
Recommendations: – – – – – – – 29
References: – – – – – – – – – 31
Appendix: 1 – – – – – – – – – 35
Appendix: 2 – – – – – – – – 38
Table 1: – – – – – – – – 24
Table 2: – – – – – – – – 25
Table 3: – – – – – – – – 26
Bacillus thuringrensis (Bt) is a well known and widely studied bacterium
which is known for its use in pest management. Today it is the most
successful commercial xenobiotic with its worldwide application when
compared with the chemical pesticides; Bacillus thuringiensis has the
advantages of being biologically degradable, selectively active on pests and
less likely to cause resistance. Safety of Bacillus thuringiensis formulations
for humans, beneficial animals and plants explains the replacement of
chemical pesticides in many countries with these environmentally friendly
pest control agents.
Bacillus thuringiensis was first isolated by the Japanese Scientist Ishiwata
(1901) from skilkworm larvae, bombyxmori, exhibiting sotto disease. After
10 years, Berliner (1911) isolated the square gram (+) positive, sporeforming, rod shaped soil bacterium from disease flour moth larvae, Anngasta
Kachmiccalla, in the Thuringia region of the Germany and named it as
Bacillus thuringiensis.
In the early 1930s Bacillus thuringiensis was used against Ostrinianubilis, the
European corn borer. The first commercial product was available in 1938 in
France, with the trade name sporeine (Weiser, 1986). It was Bacillus
thuringiensis subspecies Kurstaki that was used for the control of the insect
(Lepidopteran) pests in agriculture and forestry (Luthy & Ebersold, 1981).
New commercial products arrived in 1980s after the discovering of
subspecies thuringiensis opened the gate for black fly and mosquito larvae
Like all organisms, insect are susceptible to infection by pathogenic
microorganisms, many of these infections agents have a narrow host range
and therefore, do not cause uncontrolled destruction of beneficial insects and
are not toxic to vertebrates. Bacillus thuringiensis is a major microorganism,
which shows entamopathogenic activity (Glazer & Nikaido, 1995, Schnepf,
et al. 1998) which forms parasporal crystals during the stationary phase of its
growth cycle.
Most Bacillus thuringiensis preparations available on the market contain
spores with parasporal inclusion bodies composed of δ – endotoxins. In
commercial production, the crystals and spores obtained from fermentation
are concentrated and formulated for spray on application according to
conventional Agriculture practices (Baum, Kakefuda, & Gawron-Burke,
1996). There are many strains of Bacillus thuringiensis having insecticidal
activity against insect order (eg Lepidoptera, Diptera, Homoptera,
Mollaphage, Coloptera). Only a few of them have been commercially
Bacillus thuringiensis insecticides are divided into three groups, group one
has been used for the control of lepidopterans. These groups of insecticides
are formulated with Bacillus thuringiensis Subspecies. Kurstaki, group two
contains thesandiego and tenebrionis strains of Bacillus thuringiensisand has
been applied for the control of certain celopterans and their larvae. Group
three contains the Israelensis strains of Bacillus thuringiensis which has been
used to control black flies and mosquitoes.
The existence of parasporal inclusions in Bt was first noted I 1915 (Berliner
1915) but their protein composition was not delineated until the 1950s
(Angus 1954). Hannay (1953) detected the crystalline fine structure that is a
property of most of the parasporal inclusion. Bacillus thuringiensis
subspecies can synthesize more than one inclusion, which may contain
different ICPs. ICPs have been called data endotoxins; however since the
term endotoxin usually refers to toxin associated with the other membranes of
gram-negative bacteria, comprising a core lipopoly saccharide. Depending on
their ICP composition, the crystals have various forms (bipyramidal,
cuboidal, flat rhomboid, or a composition with two or more crystal types. A
partial correlation between crystal morphology, ICP composition, and
bioactivity against target insects has been established (Bulla et al.1977).
Hofte and Whitely, 1989, Lynch and Baumman, 1985).
Bacillus thuringiensis is a member of the genes Bacillus and like the other
members of the taxon, has the ability to form endospores that are resistant to
inactivation by heat, desiccation and organic solvent. The spore formation of
the organism varies from terminal to subterminal in sporangia that are not
swollen, therefore, Bacillus thuringiensis resembles other members of
Bacillus species in morphology and shape (Stahly, Andrews, & Yousten,
1991). The organism is gram-positive and facultitative anaerobes. The shape
of the cells of the organism is rod. The size when grown in standard liquid
media varies 3 – 5um.
The most distinguishing features of Bacillus thuringiensis from other closely
related Bacillus species. (eg Bacillus anthracis, Bacillus. cereus) is the
presence of the parasporal crystal body that is near to the spore outside the
exosporangium during the endospore formation, which is shown in figure 1:1
(Andrews, Bibilops, & Bulla, 1985; Andrews, Faust, Wabiko, Raymond, &
Bulla, 1987; Bulla, Faust, Andrews, & Goodma, 1995). Bacillus thuringiensis
is an insecticide producing variant of Bacillus cereus (Gordon, Haynes, &
Pang, 1973) several Bt species also produce Bacillus cereus type
enterotooxin (Carlson, & Kolsto, 1993) plasmids coding for the insecticidal
toxin of Bacillus thuringiensis have been transferred into B. cereus to make it
a crystal producing variant of Bacillus thuringiensis(Gonzalez, Brown,
Carlton, 1982) molecular methods including genomic restriction digestion
analysis and 16 rRNA sequence comparison support that Bacillus
thuringiensis, Bacillus anthracis and Bacillus cereus are closely relocated
species and they should be considered as a single species (Carlson, Caugant,
& Kolstra, 1994; Ash , Farrow, Dorsch, Stackebrandt, & Collins. 1991;
Helgason et al.2000).
The classification of Bacillus thuringiensis based on the serological analysis
of the flagella antigens was introduced in the early 1960s (de Barjac &
Bonnefoi, 1962). This classification by serotype has been supplemented by
morphological and biochemical criteria (de Barjac, 1981). Clutill (1977),
explains that only 13 Bacillus thuringiensis subspecies were toxic to
lepidopteran Larva only. And apparently Nematode (Narva et; al., 1991)
enlarged the host range and markedly increased the number of subspecies up
to the end of 1998, over 67 subspecies based on flagella H – Serovars had
been identified.
Although our knowledge about Bacillus thuringiensis occurs naturally and
it can also be added to an ecosystem artificially to control pest, prevalence of
Bacillus thuringiensis in nature can be said as “natural” and can be isolated
when there is no previous record of application of the organism for pest
The Bacillus thuringiensis which belong to artificial habitat areas are sprayed
based insecticides (mixture of spores and crystal). (Stahly et al. 1991). Thus,
it is obvious that Bacillus thuringiensis is widespread in nature. However, the
normal habitat of the organism is soil. The organism grows naturally as
asaprophyle, feeding on dead. Organic matter, therefore, the spores of
Bacillus thuringiensis persist in soil and its vegetative growth occurs when
there is nutrient available. Moreover Bacillus thuringiensis has recently been
isolated from marine environments (Maeda et al. 2000) and from soil of
Antarctica also (Foresty & Logan 2000).
However the true role of the bacteria is not clear. Although it produces
parasporal crystal inclusions that are toxic to many orders of insects, some
species of Bacillus thuringiensis from diverse environments show no
insecticidal activity. The insecticidal activities of Bacillus thuringiensis are
rare in nature. For example, Iriarte et al.(2000) reported that there is no
relationship between mosquito breeding sites and pathogenic action level of
Bacillus thuringiensis in the surveyed aquatic habitats. While another study
suggested that habitat with a high density of insect were originated by the
pathogenic action of this bacterium (Itoqou Apoyolo et al.1995).
At the period of the active growth cycle, the strains of Bacillus
thuringiensis produce extracellular compounds; this compound might yield to
virulence. These extracellular compounds include proteases, chitinases
phospholipases, and vegetative conseticidal protein (Zhang et al. 1993;
Sohneff et al. 1998).
Bacillus thuringrensis also produces antibiotics compounds having antifungal
activity (stab et al. 1994). However the crystal toxins are more effective then
these extracellular compounds and allow the development of the bacteria in
dead insect larvae.
Bacillus thuringiensis strains also produce a protease, which is called
inhibitor. This protein attacks and selectively destroys cecropiris and attacisis
which are antibacterial proteins in insects, as a result of this, the defence
response of the insect collapses. This protease activity is specific, it attacks an
open hydrophobic region near C – terminus of the cecropin and it does not
attack the globular proteins (Duthambar & Steiner, 1984).
Other important insecticidal proteins which are unrelated to crustal proteins
are vegetative insecticidal protein. These proteins are produce by some
strains of Bacillus thuringiensis during vegetative growth.
Colony forms can help to distinguish Bacillus thuringiensis colonies from
other Bacillus species. The organism forms white, rough colonies, which
spread out and can expand over the plate very quickly. Bacillus thuringiensis
strains have unswallon and ellipsoidal spores that lie in the subterminal
position. The presence of parasporal crystals that are adjacent to the spore in
another cell is the best criteria to distinguish Bacillus thuringiensis from other
closely related Bacillus species. The size number, of parasporal inclusion and
morphology may vary among Bacillus thuringiensis strains. However, four
distinct crystal morphologies are apparently the typical bipyramidal crystal,
related to crystal proteins (Aronson et al. 1976). Cuboidal usually associated
with bipyramidal crystal (Ohba&Aizawi 1986), amorphous and composite
crystals related to cry4 and cry proteins (federicet al. 1990), and flat, square
crystal related to cry3 proteins (Hernstadet al. 1986, Lopezmeza & Ibarra,
The classification was based in part on the possession of parasporal bodies.
Bernard et al.(1997) isolated 5303 Bacillus thuringiensis from 80 different
countries and 2793 of them were classified according to their crystal shape.
Bacillus thuringiensis vary’s based on geographical or environmental
location. Each habitat may contain novel Bacillus thuringiensis isolated that
have more toxic effects on target insects. Intensive screening programs have
been identified Bacillus thuringiensis strain from soil, plant surfaces and
stored product dust samples. Therefore many strain collections have been
described in the literature, such as Assian (Chak et al. 1994, Ben – Dov et al.
1997, 1999) and Maxican (Bravo et al. 1998).
Therefore the aim of this study is to isolate Bacillus thuringiensis from soil
sample and to isolate Bacillus thuringiensis against larva of mosquito or to
determine Bacillus thuringiensis against larva of mosquito


DISCLAIMER: All project works, files and documents posted on this website, are the property/copyright of their respective owners. They are for research reference/guidance purposes only and some of the works may be crowd-sourced. Please don’t submit someone’s work as your own to avoid plagiarism and its consequences. Use it as a reference/citation/guidance purpose only and not copy the work word for word (verbatim). The paper should be used as a guide or framework for your own paper. The contents of this paper should be able to help you in generating new ideas and thoughts for your own study. is a repository of research works where works are uploaded for research guidance. Our aim of providing this work is to help you eradicate the stress of going from one school library to another in search of research materials. This is a legal service because all tertiary institutions permit their students to read previous works, projects, books, articles, journals or papers while developing their own works. This is where the need for literature review comes in. “What a good artist understands is that nothing comes from nowhere. The paid subscription on is a means by which the website is maintained to support Open Education. If you see your work posted here by any means, and you want it to be removed/credited, please contact us with the web address link to the work. We will reply to and honour every request. Please notice it may take up to 24 – 48 hours to process your request.

WeCreativez WhatsApp Support
Administrator (Online)
Hello and welcome. I am online and ready to help you via WhatsApp chat. Let me know if you need my assistance.